ENSO Forecast Navigation

ENSO Forecasts

ENSO Forecast

March 2025 Quick Look

Published: March 19, 2025

A monthly summary of the status of El Niño, La Niña, and the Southern Oscillation, or ENSO, based on the NINO3.4 index (120-170W, 5S-5N)

As of mid-March 2025, the equatorial Pacific is transitioning from weak La Niña conditions to a ENSO-neutral state. This shift is marked by sea surface temperatures in the Niño 3.4 region that are now closer to average, with anomalies at -0.35°C for Feb, 2025, well above the -0.5°C threshold required for La Niña conditions. The IRI ENSO plume forecast indicates a high probability (91%) for ENSO-neutral conditions from Mar-May 2025, and these conditionAs of mid-March 2025, the equatorial Pacific is transitioning from weak La Niña conditions to a ENSO-neutral state. This shift is marked by sea surface temperatures in the Niño 3.4 region that are now closer to average, with anomalies at -0.35°C for Feb, 2025, well above the -0.5°C threshold required for La Niña conditions. The IRI ENSO plume forecast indicates a high probability (91%) for ENSO-neutral conditions from Mar-May 2025, and these conditions are favored to continue through Sep-Nov 2025. For the later forecast seasons, Oct-Dec 2025 and Nov-Jan 2025/26, there is no strong preference for any category, although La Niña is slightly favored over ENSO-neutral. The probability of El Niño remains very low throughout the forecast period, increasing gradually from 1% in Apr-Jun to 20% in Nov-Jan 2025/26.s are favored to continue through Sep-Nov 2025. For the later forecast seasons, Oct-Dec 2025 and Nov-Jan 2025/26, there is no strong preference for any category, although La Niña is slightly favored over ENSO-neutral. The probability of El Niño remains very low throughout the forecast period, increasing gradually from 1% in Apr-Jun to 20% in Nov-Jan 2025/26.

Figures 1 and 3 (the official CPC ENSO probability forecast and the objective model-based IRI ENSO probability forecast, respectively) are often quite similar. However, occasionally they may differ noticeably. There can be several reasons for differences. One possible reason is that the human forecasters, using their experience and judgment, may disagree to some degree with the models, which may have known biases. Another reason is related to the fact that the models are not run at the same time that the forecasters make their assessment, so that the starting ENSO conditions may be slightly different between the two times. The charts on this Quick Look page are updated at two different times of the month, so that between the second and the third Thursday of the month, the official forecast (Fig. 1) has just been updated, while the model-based forecasts (Figs. 3 and 4) are still from the third Thursday of the previous month. On the other hand, from the third Thursday of the month until the second Thursday of the next month, the model-based forecasts are more recently updated, while the official forecasts remain from the second Thursday of the current month.
Click on the for more information on each figure.

Historically Speaking

    El Niño and La Niña events tend to develop during the period Apr-Jun and they
  • Tend to reach their maximum strength during October - February
  • Typically persist for 9-12 months, though occasionally persisting for up to 2 years
  • Typically recur every 2 to 7 years

ENSO Forecast

CPC ENSO Update

Published: March 13, 2025

El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Diagnostic Discussion issued by the Climate Prediction Center/NCEP/NWS

ENSO Alert System Status: La Niña Advisory

Synopsis: ENSO-neutral is favored to develop in the next month and persist through the Northern Hemisphere summer (62% chance in June-August 2025).

During February 2025, below-average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) weakened in the central and east-central equatorial Pacific Ocean (Fig. 1). All weekly Niño indices reflected this decline, with near-to-below average values lingering in the Niño-3.4 and Niño-4 regions (Fig. 2). Significant coastal warming was evident near South America, with the latest Niño-1+2 value at 1.6°C.  This warming, however, was shallow (in the upper 50m) and was associated with low-level westerly wind anomalies over the eastern Pacific.  Below-average subsurface temperatures also weakened (Fig. 3), but negative anomalies persisted at depth in the eastern Pacific and extended down to 200m in the central Pacific (Fig. 4). Tropical Pacific atmospheric anomalies continued to indicate La Niña conditions. Low-level wind anomalies remained easterly over the western and central Pacific, while upper-level wind anomalies were westerly over the east-central Pacific.  Convection was suppressed around the Date Line and was enhanced near Indonesia (Fig. 5). The traditional and equatorial Southern Oscillation indices were positive.  Collectively, the coupled ocean-atmosphere system reflected weakening La Niña conditions and a trend toward ENSO-neutral.

The IRI and North American multi-model ensemble predicts a transition to ENSO-neutral in the coming season (Fig. 6). The forecast team concurs and predicts ENSO-neutral, with chances greater than 50% through July-September 2025.  As is typical for forecasts made in the spring, there is large forecast uncertainty at longer time horizons, with no outcome exceeding a 50% chance (chances of El Niño are the lowest). In summary, ENSO-neutral is favored to develop in the next month and persist through the Northern Hemisphere summer (62% chance in June-August 2025; Fig. 7).

This discussion is a consolidated effort of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), NOAA’s National Weather Service, and their funded institutions. Oceanic and atmospheric conditions are updated weekly on the Climate Prediction Center web site (El Niño/La Niña Current Conditions and Expert Discussions). Additional perspectives and analysis are also available in an ENSO blog. A probabilistic strength forecast is available here. The next ENSO Diagnostics Discussion is scheduled for 10 April 2025. To receive an e-mail notification when the monthly ENSO Diagnostic Discussions are released, please send an e-mail message to: ncep.list.enso-update@noaa.gov.

Season La Niña Neutral El Niño
FMA 25 75 0
MAM 19 81 0
AMJ 22 77 1
MJJ 24 72 4
JJA 29 62 9
JAS 33 55 12
ASO 38 49 13
SON 40 46 14
OND 42 42 16

IRI ENSO Forecast

IRI Technical ENSO Update

Published: March 19, 2025

Note: The SST anomalies cited below refer to the OISSTv2 SST data set, and not ERSSTv5. OISSTv2 is often used for real-time analysis and model initialization, while ERSSTv5 is used for retrospective official ENSO diagnosis because it is more homogeneous over time, allowing for more accurate comparisons among ENSO events that are years apart. These two products may differ, particularly during ENSO events. The difference between the two datasets may be as much as 0.5 °C. Additionally in some years, the ERSSTv5 may tend to be cooler than OISSTv2 in the context of warming trends, because ERSSTv5 is expressed relative to a base period that is updated every 5 years, while the base period of OISSTv2 is updated every 10 years. In February 2021, both datasets were updated to reflect the 1991-2020 climatology period.

Recent and Current Conditions

 The SST anomaly in the NINO3.4 region during the Dec-Feb 2025 season was -0.56 °C, and for February 2025, it was -0.35 °C. The most recent weekly average (week centered on March 12, 2025) of the NINO3.4 index was 0.3 °C. The latest seasonal, monthly, and weekly values suggest that the tropical Pacific has been experiencing ENSO-neutral conditions. The IRI’s definition of El Niño, similar to NOAA/Climate Prediction Center’s, requires that the monthly SST anomaly in the NINO3.4 region (5°S-5°N; 170°W-120°W) exceed +0.5 °C. Similarly, for La Niña, the anomaly must be -0.5 °C or colder.

As of mid-March 2025, some atmospheric indicators are showing La Niña conditions, while oceanic variables are closer to ENSO-neutral. For instance, the traditional Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) for February 2025 was +3.0, placing it within the ENSO-neutral range, while the equatorial SOI for the same month was +1.0, falling within the La Niña range. The trade winds (at 850 hPa) were stronger than normal in the central-western Pacific but weaker than normal in the eastern Pacific during February 2025. The upper-level winds (at 200 hPa) are close to average over the equatorial Pacific. Atmospheric convection over the central Pacific is strongly below normal, while above-normal cloudiness is observed over Indonesia, consistent with typical La Niña conditions. Below-average ocean temperatures persist at depth in the eastern and central Pacific, while above-average temperatures dominate at depth in the western Pacific (between 140° and 180°). Warmer temperatures are also present in the eastern Pacific from the surface to 25 meters below the surface and are spreading westward. Together, these observed conditions in the coupled ocean-atmosphere system indicate ENSO-neutral conditions in the equatorial Pacific.

Expected Conditions:

Note – Only models that produce a new ENSO prediction every month are considered in this statement.

What is the outlook for the ENSO status going forward?

The El Niño/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) Diagnostic Discussion released on 13 March 2025 by the Climate Prediction Center/NCEP/NWS maintained La Niña Advisory, but forecasted development of the ENSO-neutral conditions in the next month that could persist through the Northern Hemisphere summer (62% chance in June-August 2025).

The latest set of ENSO prediction models from mid-March 2025 is now available in the IRI ENSO prediction plume. These are used to assess the probabilities of the three ENSO categories by using the average value of the NINO3.4 SST anomaly predictions from all models in the plume, equally weighted. A standard Gaussian error is imposed over that averaged forecast, with its width determined by an estimate of overall expected model skill for the season of the year and the lead time. Higher skill results in a relatively narrower error distribution, while low skill results in an error distribution with width approaching that of the historical observed distribution.

According to the ENSO forecast issued by the IRI in March 2025, there is a high probability (91%) for ENSO-neutral conditions during March-May 2025, while the chances for La Niña conditions are only 9%. For the periods Apr-Jun to Sep-Nov, ENSO-neutral conditions are favored at 86%, 76%, 63%, 57%, 50%, and 45% respectively. The probability of La Niña gradually increases from 13% to 38% during the same period. For Oct-Dec 2025 and Nov-Jan 2025/26, La Niña conditions are favored with a 41% chance, while the probability of ENSO-neutral continuation is 40% and 39% respectively. The probability of El Niño remains low throughout the forecast period, though it increases gradually from 1% in April-June to 20% in Nov-Jan 2025/26. A plot of the probabilities summarizes the forecast evolution. The climatological probabilities for La Niña, ENSO-neutral, and El Niño conditions vary seasonally, and are shown by the lines on the plot, and are given in a table at the bottom of this page for each 3-month season.

Caution is advised in interpreting the forecast distribution from the Gaussian standard error as the actual probabilities, due to differing biases and performance of the different models. In particular, this approach considers only the mean of the predictions, and not the total range across the models, nor the ensemble range within individual models. At longer leads, the skill of the models degrades, and uncertainty in skill must be convolved with the uncertainties from initial conditions and differing model physics, which leads to more climatological probabilities in the long-lead ENSO Outlook than might be suggested by the suite of models. Furthermore, the expected skill of one model versus another has not been established using uniform validation procedures, which may cause a difference in the true probability distribution.

In summary, the forecast indicates a high probability of ENSO-neutral conditions for Mar-May 2025, and these conditions are expected to persist until Sep-Nov 2025. Observations confirm that moderate surface warming in the eastern Pacific is spreading westward due to a strong surge of westerly wind anomalies over the past four weeks in the eastern Pacific. However, this warming is quite shallow, and beneath the surface, below 50 meters, weak cold temperatures exist. Therefore, this recent warming may be tapered off by the trade winds, which are expected to strengthen according to recent forecasts. It is worth noting that the Relative Oceanic Niño Index (RONI: https://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/data/indices/RONI.ascii.txt), which measures sea surface temperature anomalies in the Niño 3.4 region (5°N–5°S, 120°W–170°W) relative to the rest of the equatorial band, has remained below the -0.5 La Niña threshold for the past seven overlapping seasons (-0.51 for Jun-Aug, -0.63 for Jul-Sep, -0.75 for Aug-Oct, -0.80 for Sep-Nov 2024, -0.91 for Oct-Dec, -1.09 for Nov-Jan, and -1.18 for Dec-Feb). Similarly, the Multivariate ENSO-Index  (MEI: https://psl.noaa.gov/enso/mei/), which accounts for both oceanic and atmospheric conditions, registered -0.8°C during Jan-Feb 2025. Therefore, while the traditional ENSO index (Niño 3.4) is now showing values that are outside the range of La Niña threshold in the month of February 2025, other indices that incorporate global warming signals and atmospheric patterns have been indicative of La Niña-like conditions since mid 2024 and still showing La Niña-like conditions.

A caution regarding the model-based ENSO plume predictions (released mid-month) is that factors such as known specific model biases and recent changes in the tropical Pacific the models may have missed, are not considered. This approach is purely objective. Those issues are taken into account in CPC’s official outlooks, which are issued early in the month, and which will include some human judgment in combination with the model guidance.

IRI ENSO Forecast Histogram Image
Season La Niña Neutral El Niño
MAM 9 91 0
AMJ 13 86 1
MJJ 17 76 7
JJA 23 63 14
JAS 28 57 15
ASO 34 50 16
SON 38 45 17
OND 41 40 19
NDJ 41 39 20

ENSO Forecast

IRI Model-Based Probabilistic ENSO Forecast

Published: March 19, 2025

A purely objective ENSO probability forecast, based on regression, using as input the model predictions from the plume of dynamical and statistical forecasts shown in the ENSO Predictions Plume. Each of the forecasts is weighted equally. It is updated near or just after the middle of the month, using forecasts from the plume models that are run in the first half of the month. It does not use any human interpretation or judgment. This is updated on the third Thursday of the month.

IRI ENSO Forecast Histogram Image

Season La Niña Neutral El Niño
MAM 9 91 0
AMJ 13 86 1
MJJ 17 76 7
JJA 23 63 14
JAS 28 57 15
ASO 34 50 16
SON 38 45 17
OND 41 40 19
NDJ 41 39 20

ENSO Forecast

CPC Official Probabilistic ENSO Forecast

Published: March 13, 2025

The official CPC ENSO probability forecast, based on a consensus of CPC and IRI forecasters. It is updated during the first half of the month, in association with the official CPC ENSO Diagnostic Discussion. It is based on observational and predictive information from early in the month and from the previous month. It uses human judgment in addition to model output, while the forecast shown in the Model-Based Probabilistic ENSO Forecast relies solely on model output. This is updated on the second Thursday of every month.

NOAA?CPC ENSO Forecast Image
NOAA/CPC ENSO Forecast Graphic, courtesy of NOAA/CPC
Season La Niña Neutral El Niño
FMA 25 75 0
MAM 19 81 0
AMJ 22 77 1
MJJ 24 72 4
JJA 29 62 9
JAS 33 55 12
ASO 38 49 13
SON 40 46 14
OND 42 42 16

ENSO Forecast

IRI ENSO Predictions Plume

Published: March 19, 2025

Note on interpreting model forecasts

The following graph and table show forecasts made by dynamical and statistical models for SST in the Nino 3.4 region for nine overlapping 3-month periods. Note that the expected skills of the models, based on historical performance, are not equal to one another. The skills also generally decrease as the lead time increases. Thirdly, forecasts made at some times of the year generally have higher skill than forecasts made at other times of the year--namely, they are better when made between June and December than when they are made between February and May. Differences among the forecasts of the models reflect both differences in model design, and actual uncertainty in the forecast of the possible future SST scenario.

Interactive Chart

You can highlight a specific model by hovering over it either on the chart or the legend. Selecting An item on the legend will toggle the visibility of the model on the page. You can also select DYN MODELS or STAT MODELS to toggle them all at once. Clicking on the "burger" menu above the legend will give you options to download the image or expand to full screen. If you have any feedback on this new feature, please let us know at webmaster@iri.columbia.edu.

List of Models Used

Forecast SST Anomalies (deg C) in the Nino 3.4 Region

Seasons (2025 – 2025)
Model MAM AMJ MJJ JJA JAS ASO SON OND NDJ
Dynamical Models
AUS-ACCESS 0.23 0.30 0.50 0.63
BCC DIAP -0.16 -0.06 0.07 0.19 0.26 0.38 0.51 0.59 0.72
CMC CANSIP -0.15 -0.27 -0.24 -0.16 -0.12 -0.10 -0.09 -0.04 0.05
COLA CCSM4 -0.10 -0.11 -0.14 -0.30 -0.54 -0.79 -0.91 -0.92 -0.78
CS-IRI-MM 0.06 0.16 0.19 0.17 0.05 -0.06
DWD -0.51 -0.60 -0.58 -0.50
ECMWF -0.04 0.00 0.13 0.24 0.26
GFDL SPEAR 0.10 0.19 0.26 0.22 0.09 -0.08 -0.21 -0.32 -0.31
IOCAS ICM 0.03 0.02 -0.02 -0.06 -0.11 -0.20 -0.36 -0.54 -0.66
JMA -0.04 -0.06 -0.06 -0.10 -0.19
KMA 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.20
LDEO -0.29 -0.22 -0.18 -0.21 -0.33 -0.52 -0.72 -0.90 -1.01
MetFRANCE -0.32 -0.33 -0.22 -0.07 -0.03
NASA GMAO -0.61 -0.75 -0.78 -0.84 -0.91 -1.02 -1.02
NCEP CFSv2 -0.35 -0.37 -0.33 -0.27 -0.23 -0.20 -0.20
SINTEX-F -0.20 -0.17 -0.04 0.13 0.23 0.20 0.14 0.12 0.19
UKMO -0.07 0.00 0.01 -0.05
Average, Dynamical models -0.136 -0.128 -0.073 -0.046 -0.120 -0.239 -0.320 -0.288 -0.257
Statistical Models
BCC_RZDM -0.32 -0.34 -0.36 -0.39 -0.44 -0.55 -0.66 -0.82 -0.91
CPC CA -0.24 -0.08 -0.03 -0.12 -0.27 -0.50 -0.67 -0.88 -0.94
CPC MRKOV -0.97 -0.91 -0.88 -0.87 -0.90 -0.95 -1.00 -0.98 -0.88
CSU CLIPR -0.19 -0.27 -0.35 -0.43 -0.52 -0.61 -0.70 -0.72 -0.75
IAP-NN -0.17 0.05 0.27 0.44 0.58 0.69 0.78 0.82 0.79
JAMSTEC CNN 0.03 -0.06 -0.04 -0.47 -0.74 -0.76 -0.68 -0.48 -0.24
NTU CODA -0.12 0.10 0.19 0.19 0.44 0.46 0.55 0.60 0.49
TONGJI-ML -0.49 -0.43 -0.22 0.02 0.23 0.35 0.40
UCLA-TCD 0.00 0.19 0.33 0.39 0.39 0.34 0.26 0.18 0.12
UW PSL-CSLIM -0.21 -0.11 -0.07 -0.08 -0.13 -0.19 -0.26 -0.32 -0.36
UW PSL-LIM -0.33 -0.26 -0.20 -0.16 -0.14 -0.14 -0.16 -0.18 -0.18
XRO -0.35 -0.38 -0.43 -0.46 -0.45 -0.42 -0.41 -0.42 -0.42
Average, Statistical models -0.280 -0.209 -0.149 -0.161 -0.162 -0.191 -0.213 -0.291 -0.298
Average, All models -0.196 -0.161 -0.104 -0.094 -0.141 -0.213 -0.259 -0.290 -0.282

Discussion of Current Forecasts

The IRI ENSO prediction plume indicates high chances for ENSO-neutral conditions during Mar-May 2025. The multimodel mean of statistical and dynamical models show ENSO-neutral conditions during the forecasts period (March to November). Based on the multi-model mean (Dynamical + Statistical) prediction, and the expected skill of the models by start time and lead time, the probabilities (in %) for La Niña, ENSO-neutral and El Niño conditions (using -0.5 °C and 0.5 °C thresholds) over the coming 9 seasons are:

Season La Niña Neutral El Niño
MAM 9 91 0
AMJ 13 86 1
MJJ 17 76 7
JJA 23 63 14
JAS 28 57 15
ASO 34 50 16
SON 38 45 17
OND 41 40 19
NDJ 41 39 20

Summary of forecasts issued over last 22 months

The following interactive plot shows the model forecasts issued not only from the current month (as in the plot above), but also from the 21 months previous to this month. The observations are shown up to the most recently completed 3-month period. The plots allow comparison of plumes from the previous start times, or examination of the forecast behavior of a given model over time.
Hovering over any single model will highlight that particular model in the chart.
Clicking a particular model will hide/show that model in the chart.
At the bottom of the plot, you can select which models to show in the chart: all the models, the dynamical models only, or the statistical models only.

Notes on the data 

Only models producing forecasts on a monthly basis are included. This means that some models whose forecasts appear in the Experimental Long-Lead Forecast Bulletin (produced by COLA) do not appear in the table.

Once an IRI ENSO probability forecast has been published, the results stand even if a model reports an error and changes their data. When this happens we will update the plume with the model's correct values even though our forecast hasn't changed. What this means is that our forecast is always the same, but the underlying data may be different from what we based our forecast on.

The SST anomaly forecasts are for the 3-month periods shown, and are for the Nino 3.4 region (120-170W, 5N-5S). Often, the anomalies are provided directly in a graph or a table by the respective forecasting centers for the Nino 3.4 region. In some cases, however, they are given for 1-month periods, for 3-month periods that skip some of the periods in the above table, and/or only for a region (or regions) other than Nino 3.4. In these cases, the following means are used to obtain the needed anomalies for the table:

  • Temporal averaging
  • Linear temporal interpolation
  • Visual averaging of values on a contoured map

The anomalies shown are those with respect to the base period used to define the normals, which vary among the groups producing model forecasts. They have not been adjusted to anomalies with respect to a common base period. Discrepancies among the climatological SST resulting from differing base periods may be as high as a quarter of a degree C in the worst cases. Forecasters are encouraged to use the standard 1991-2020 period as the base period, or a period not very different from it.

Historical SST Anomalies Image

ENSO Forecast

Forecast Probability Distribution Based on the IRI ENSO Prediction Plume

Published: March 19, 2025

The plots on this page show predictions of seasonal (3-month average) sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly in the Niño3.4 region in the east-central tropical Pacific (5°N-5°S, 120°-170°W), covering the nine overlapping seasons beginning with the current month. The predictions are based on the large (20+) set of dynamical and statistical models in the plume of model ENSO predictions.

  • Model Based Prediction Percentiles Image

    Figure 5

    Predictions of ENSO are probabilistic. The ensemble mean prediction is only a best single guess. On either side of that prediction, there is a substantial uncertainty distribution, or error tolerance. The second plot (Figure 2) shows the estimated probability distribution of the predictions, showing a set of percentiles within that distribution for each lead time. The distribution is modeled as a normal (Gaussian) distribution, so that the overall mean forecast represents the center, or 50 percentile, in the distribution. The overall mean is formed using equal weighting among all models. On either side, other percentile values are shown symmetrically, ranging from 1 to 99 and including some intermediate percentiles (5 and 95, 15 and 85, and 25 and 75). The plot enables a user to estimate the probability of the Niño3.4 SST anomaly to be greater or less than some critical value, or within some interval. If, for example, the 85 percentile falls at 1.8° C above average, the probability of the SST exceeding 1.8° C can be estimated at 15%. Probabilities for exceeding or not exceeding values not exactly on percentile line can be roughly interpolated by eye. The overall width of the probability distribution is derived from the historical skill of the hindcasts of the models, from 1982 to present, for the specific forecast start time and lead time. This method of defining the probability distribution represents one of two general approaches, the other approach being a direct counting of ensemble members within each of the percentile bands. This second approach assumes that the ensemble spreads of the models are true representations of the uncertainty. Individual model spreads have often been found to be somwehate narrower than they should be, although in multi-model ensembles this tendency has been shown to be milder or even eliminated.

  • Model Based Prediction Distribution Image

    Figure 6

    Figure 6, sometimes called a spaghetti diagram, shows synthetically generated prediction scenarios that are equally likely. Here, 100 scenarios are shown; any number can be generated for such a diagram. Each scenario is produced using a random number generator, combined with knowledge of the mean forecast and its uncertainty, as well as the amount of persistence of anomalies. The degree of persistence of anomalies is based on the correlation of prediction errors from one lead time to another. In other words, the individual lines are designed to show the correct amount of persistence as expected in nature, rather than jumping around more randomly from one lead time to the next. The uncertainty and persistence statistics are based on the set of 7 NMME (North American Multimodel Ensemble) models, as it is assumed that these statistics are approximately applicable to all of the models. Sometimes the “spaghetti density” may appear asymmetric about the mean of all the forecasts or outside of the 85 and 15 percentile lines. This is purely sampling variability, and would not occur if many thousands of such lines were plotted. But with that many lines, most of the plot would be too crowded to get a sense of the behavior of the lines near the center of the distribution. The main purpose of the diagram is to serve users who want to assess realistic individual scenarios of ENSO behavior rather than statistical summaries of the forecast like the percentiles shown in the second plot.

The CPC ENSO forecast is released at 9am (Eastern Time) on the second Thursday of each month.

The IRI ENSO forecast is released on the 19th of each month. If the 19th falls on a weekend or holiday, it is released on the closest business day.

All data from this website is covered under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. When citing IRI ENSO images or data, please use "Images [or Data] provided by The International Research Institute for Climate and Society, Columbia University Climate School", with a link to https://iri.columbia.edu/ENSO.