IRI Home

  ENSO Quick Look
  IRI ENSO Update / Forecast
  Technical ENSO Update
  Summary of Model Forecasts
  Monthly archive

Technical ENSO Update

18 November 2004

> Current conditions
> Expected conditions

Current Conditions

SST conditions within the central and western-central equatorial Pacific, averaged over October, were above-average and of a magnitude indicative of weak El Niño conditions. Currently the IRI's definition of El Niño conditions rests on an index of SST anomalies, averaged over the NINO3.4 region (5S-5N; 170W-120W), exceeding the warmest 25%-ile of the historical distribution. Since the last week of July, SSTs in the NINO3.4 region have been approximately three-quarters of a degree C above average. At this time of year, that magnitude of NINO3.4 just barely qualifies as El Niño conditions. In order to be considered an El Niño "event", El Niño conditions must persist for at least 5-6 months.

Observations from late-October to mid-November indicate SST anomalies exceeding 0.5 degrees C from 160E to 130W with a maximum anomaly on the equator of approximately 1.5 degrees C in the vicinity of 175E.  Although the pattern of above-average SST anomalies is large-scale, it is focused just west of the dateline rather than in the eastern or central-eastern Pacific, and thus differs from previous El Niños.The eastern Pacific, which is usually instrumental in the development of an El Niño event, has remained largely neutral throughout 2004. The SSTs in the far eastern equatorial Pacific had actually been below-average, but over the last month, they have warmed to near average. Positive anomalies of  2 to 4 degrees C are observed in the sub-surface ocean near the thermocline depth in the central Pacific. The positive anomalies in SST and in the sub-surface temperature in the western-central Pacific are the result of westerly wind events that occurred during June, August, and October in the western Pacific. These westerly wind events advected the eastern edge of the West Pacific warm pool further eastward. Low-level westerly wind anomalies have shown some persistence since May, but they have been weak and have remained west of approximately 170E in the western Pacific, in contrast to previous El Niño events where the persistent westerly wind anomalies were at least twice as strong and extended to 170W or even farther east.

 The large-scale atmospheric changes expected during an El Niño event, such as enhanced convection in the central Pacific, have been conspicuously absent. Presently, anomalous convection near and east of the dateline is non-existent, suggesting that the atmosphere is not committed to the above average SSTs in the central Pacific. The Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) has been negative since June 2004, but has fluctuated considerably and the monthly values, including October, have typically had only weakly negative SOI. Furthermore, the standard SOI (which is a difference between Tahiti and Darwin SLP) this year is negative primarily because of the high pressure pattern over Indonesia and northern Australia, with little to no contribution from SLP changes over Tahiti. The anomalous conditions of late 2004 are likely to be categorized as an El Niño event, as measured by NINO3.4 SST index, but many features typical of an evolving event are not manifest.

The existence of warm SST anomalies in the central equatorial Pacific are likely to influence local climate patterns. The NINO3.4 region is implicated as the region of the tropical Pacific where SST anomalies are most associated with global ENSO teleconnections. The fact that the NINO3.4 index is (and has been since mid-2004) in the warmest 25%-ile of the historical distribution suggests that remote teleconnections are possible. However, such teleconnection responses are unlikely as long as the convection anomalies that connect SST to the overlying atmospheric circulation are absent.

Expected Conditions

Assuming at least weak persistence of the low-level westerly winds in the western Pacific, the maintenance of El Niño SST conditions is quite possible in the upcoming months. The deeper than average thermocline (above-average sub-surface temperatures) in the central Pacific should contribute to the maintenance of the central-eastern Pacific SST anomalies and may also increase SST anomalies in the far eastern equatorial Pacific in the next couple months as the subsurface perturbation moves eastward. However, since the current magnitude of the overall ocean-atmosphere coupling is weak, the possibility exists that the tropical Pacific SST anomalies could edge back towards neutral conditions.

 Presently in mid-November the potential for maintaining El Niño SST conditions for the Dec-Jan-Feb period carries a probability of 70%, which represents near tripling of the odds relative to the historical climatological likelihood. There is virtually a 0% probability for La Niña SST conditions, leaving an approximately 30% probability for neutral SST conditions. During the period of November through early 2005, there is an enhanced probability for existence of El Niño conditions (approximately 70% through early 2005), compared with the climatological probability of 25%. Because the ENSO state in early November has a strong tendency to persist throughout the remainder of the calendar year and into the early part of the next year (it "sets the stage" for the November-through-March ENSO condition), the enhanced chances of El Niño carries through to the somewhat longer leads of the current forecast.

The above assessment was made in part on the basis of an examination of the current forecasts of ENSO prediction models. For purposes of this discussion, El Niño SST conditions are defined as SSTs in the NINO3.4 region being in the warmest 25% of their climatological distribution for the 3-month period in question over the 1950-present timeframe. The corresponding cutoff in terms of degrees C of SST anomaly varies seasonally, being close to 0.4 degrees C in Mar-Apr-May and as high as 0.75 degrees C in Oct-Nov-Dec. La Niña conditions are defined as NINO3.4 region SSTs being in the coolest 25% of the climatological distribution. Neutral conditions occupy the remaining 50% of the distribution. These definitions were developed such that the most commonly accepted El Niño and La Niña episodes are reproduced.

There is some variation among ENSO model forecasts for the coming several seasons. The number of models that are forecasting El Niño conditions to be occurring in the Dec-Jan-Feb period of 2004-05 is 16 out of a total of 19, or 84%. The number of models that predict La Niña conditions is 0 (0%). At lead times of more than 4 months into the future, statistical and dynamical models that incorporate information about the ocean's observed sub-surface thermal structure generally exhibit higher predictive skill than those that do not. Among models that do use sub-surface temperature information, 14 out of 17 (82%) call for SSTs of at least a minimum El Niño level for the Dec-Jan-Feb period, while 0 (0%) predict SSTs cold enough to be considered a La Niña. (Note 1).    Overall, a majority of the models indicate that the current above-average SST conditions in the NINO3.4 region will remain warm enough to represent at least a weak El Niño. For the longer lead forecast for Mar-Apr-May 2005, 16 of the 18 models (89%) forecast El Niño conditions, 2 models (11%) forecast neutral conditions, and no models (0%) forecast La Niña conditions. If only the 16 models that use subsurface ocean temperature data are included, these figures become 15 (94%), 1 (6%), and 0 (0%). This would imply a still higher probability for El Niño to exist early in 2005. Caution is advised in interpreting the distribution of model forecasts as the actual probabilities for the coming several months. The expected skill of one model versus another has not been established using uniform validation procedures, which may cause a difference in the above probability estimate from the true probability. 

An alternative way to assess the probabilities of the three possible ENSO conditions is to use the mean of the forecasts of all models, and to construct a standard error function centered on that mean. The standard error would be Gaussian in shape, and would have its width determined by an estimate of overall expected model skill for the season of the year and the lead time. Higher skill would result in a relatively narrower error distribution, while low skill would result in an error distribution with width approaching that of the historical observed distribution. When this method is applied to the current model forecasts, results indicate an enhanced probability of El Niño that varies between 65% and 75% through the end of the 2004 calendar year, and rises to 75-90% in the very early months of 2005. For all periods the probability for La Niña is well below its climatological value of 25%. The same cautions mentioned above for the distribution of model forecasts apply to this alternative method of inferring probabilities, due to differing model biases and skills.

The IRI's probabilistic ENSO forecast takes into account the indications of this set of models, the outcome of the standard error approach described above, and additional factors such as the very latest observations that may have developed after the initialization times of some of the models. It indicates higher than average probabilities for El Niño conditions throughout the outlook period, and lower than average probabilities for La Niña. Probabilities for neutral ENSO conditions are low until the end of northern spring 2005, when they return toward their normal of approximately 50%. This suggests that the greatest likelihood is for El Niño over the coming several months and throughout the rest of 2004 and early 2005. The magnitude of the event, however, is expected to be only weak.
See also:

Note 1 - Only models that produce a new ENSO forecast every month are included in the above statement.
 
 

Top of Page