September 26, 2003

GFDL's bias

Simulation bias

Assimilation bias
Posted by mktippett at 10:06 AM

more cca

The results of yesterday's experiments suggest that weighting is not as effective as using more correlation EOFs. Of course, it's one experiment and there is lots of sampling error.

I'm going to re-do the calculations with all seasons and sets of predictors looking at up to 20 correlation EOFs. I'm also going to look at leaving 10 out (# of boots is 2*nt) instead of just one. Repeat with SST as predictor also.

Posted by mktippett at 08:28 AM

September 25, 2003

western bias

Eli sent mail to GFDL asking about a warm bias that is seen in the western Pacific during the 1980's.

Posted by mktippett at 11:38 AM

Re-sync

Need to get back to work and finish this project.

Posted by mktippett at 10:02 AM

Mutiple predictors

How best to do CCA between gridded observations and model output with multiple predictors with disparate numbers of grid points?

I'm doing CCA between observed tropical SST and the T42 observations. I'm comparing to CCA with model outputs and observations. First, I'm taking model precipitation to see if it does as well as SST. It seems not.

I'm also trying point-wise variance inflation with both SST and model precipitation.

I'm looking at the impact of using tropical model precip., regional precip and vertical shear. Each separately seems to effect a different region but if I stack them, the results don't improve as I expect.

Possible reasons: (1) using too few EOFs. Some of the "optimal" truncations are at my upper limit of 8. (2) Very different numbers of grid points. The global tropical pacific seems to dominate the others. Weight? Do stacking after EOF decomposition?

I'm trying more EOFs (16) and weighting by the number of grid points.

I was focusing on truncation of predictor EOFs but predictand EOFs may be and issue too. Suppose the two predictors have skill to two distinct areas but to separate them requires many predictand EOFs. Would not be an issue with single predictand.

Another approach is to to pre-filter, do PCA on the predictor fields separately. That way the number of degrees of freedom of the different predictors is more likley to be comparable. Cross-validation becomes more complicated.

Another alternative is to do CCA on each field separately, and then put them together again, "ensemble CCA."

Posted by mktippett at 09:34 AM