IRI/CPC ENSO Quick Look | Download PDF version
CPC/IRI ENSO Update / Forecast
Technical ENSO Update
IRI/CPC Plume-Based ENSO Forecast
CPC/IRI Consensus Probabilistic ENSO Forecast
IRI/CPC ENSO Predictions Plume
Individual Model View, last 22 months
Monthly archive
Technical ENSO Update
16 August 2012
Recent and Current Conditions
After a period of neutral ENSO conditions between May and late June 2012, SST anomalies in the east-central
tropical Pacific became sufficiently positive to be at a borderline El Niño level by early July. SST anomalies were
largest in the eastern portion of the NINO3.4 region, and weaker toward the dateline. By late July, the
anomalies in the far east weakened while those in the east-central basin increased. For July the SST anomaly in
the NINO3.4 region was 0.55 C, indicative of weak El Niño conditions. For May-July the anomaly was
0.27 C. Since late 2011, the IRI's definition of El Niño conditions began following that of
NOAA/Climate Prediction Center, in which the SST anomaly in the NINO3.4 region (5S-5N; 170W-120W) exceeds 0.45 C.
Similarly, for La Niña, the anomaly must be -0.45 C or less. The climatological probabilities for La
Niña, neutral, and El Niño conditions vary seasonally, and are shown in a table at the bottom of
this page for each 3-month season. The most recent weekly SST anomaly in the NINO3.4 region is 0.8 C, indicating
weak El Niño conditions in the tropical Pacific; this is slightly warmer than the 0.55 C level observed in July.
Expected Conditions
What is the outlook for the ENSO status going forward? The official diagnosis and outlook was issued earlier this
month in
the NOAA/Climate Prediction Center ENSO Diagnostic Discussion, produced
jointly by CPC and IRI. It carried an El Niño watch, and gave a probability of approximately 75%
for El Niño conditions developing most
likely during the August-September period, and likely lasting through the remainder of the calendar year. Now, in the middle of August, a new set of model ENSO predictions is available as shown in
the IRI/CPC ENSO prediction plume, discussed
below. The current east-central tropical
Pacific SSTs are at a weak El Niño level, and the basin-wide sea level pressure pattern has also
been in the direction of El Niño, although notably less clearly than the SST and not sufficiently to describe
El Niño conditions. Low-level zonal winds and anomalous
convection also have swung toward an El Niño state only slightly. Subsurface temperatures across the equatorial Pacific have risen to become moderately above average in the upper part of the ocean from just east of the date line eastward to 100W. The thermocline depth along the equator is above average in the western and eastern tropical Pacific, but with a relative weakness in the central part of the basin.
As of mid-August, most (but not all) of the dynamical models predict El Niño conditions for the Aug-Oct
season, continuing through most or all of the remainder of 2012. However, half or more of the statistical models predict
either just borderline El Niño conditions or just neutral ENSO conditions throughout this same period. For the
Aug-Oct season, 24% of models indicate neutral ENSO conditions, while 76% indicate development of El Niño
conditions. For Sep-Nov, 24% again indicate neutral conditions and 76% predict El Niño conditions. At lead times
of 3 or more months into the future, statistical and dynamical models that incorporate information about the
ocean's observed subsurface thermal structure generally exhibit higher predictive skill than those that do not.
For the Nov-Jan season, among models that do use subsurface temperature information, 15% predict ENSO-neutral
SSTs, and 85% predict El Niño conditions. For all models, the preference for El Niño conditions
maximizes for the Oct-Dec season, when 80% predict El Niño conditions. This probability declines to
50% for Jan-Mar 2013 and to 17% for Mar-May
(Note 1).
Caution is advised in interpreting the distribution of model predictions as the actual probabilities. At longer
leads, the skill of the models degrades, and skill uncertainty must be convolved with the uncertainties from
initial conditions and differing model physics, leading to more climatological probabilities in the long-lead ENSO
Outlook than might be suggested by the suite of models. Furthermore, the expected skill of one model versus
another has not been established using uniform validation procedures, which may cause a difference in the true
probability distribution from that taken verbatim from the raw model predictions.
An alternative way to assess the probabilities of the three possible ENSO conditions is more quantitatively
precise and less vulnerable to sampling errors than the categorical tallying method used above. This alternative
method uses the mean of the predictions of all models on the plume, equally weighted, and constructs a standard
error function centered on that mean. The standard error is Gaussian in shape, and has its width determined by an
estimate of overall expected model skill for the season of the year and the lead time. Higher skill results in a
relatively narrower error distribution, while low skill results in an error distribution with width approaching
that of the historical observed distribution. This method shows probabilities for La Niña at less than 1%
from Jul-Sep throughout the remainder of 2012. Model probabilities for ENSO-neutral conditions are 23% for
Aug-Oct, 21% to 22% for Sep-Nov through Nov-Jan 2012-13, rising to 42% for Jan-Mar 2013 and exceeding 50%
beginning in Feb-Apr 2013. Probabilities for El
Niño are 77% for Aug-Oct, 78% for Sep-Nov, and maximize at 79% for Oct-Dec,remaining at 50% or higher
through Jan-Mar 2013 and dropping to 35% by Mar-May 2013.
In words, the models collectively favor El Niño development at the present time,
lasting through northern autumn and ending during late northern winter or early spring 2012-13. For Jan-Mar 2013,
the El Niño probability is 58% and declines rapidly thereafter.
A plot of the probabilities
generated from this most recent IRI/CPC ENSO prediction plume using the multi-model mean and the Gaussian standard error method summarizes the model consensus out to about 10 months into the future. The same cautions mentioned above for the distributional count of model predictions apply to this Gaussian standard error method of inferring probabilities, due to differing model biases and skills. In particular, this approach considers only the mean of the predictions, and not the total range across the models, nor the ensemble range within individual models.
The probabilities derived from the 25 or more models on the IRI/CPC plume describe, on average, development of
weak El Niño during the present time (August or early September 2012). Howeveer, maintenance of
neutral ENSO conditions still has a
nonnegligible probability (20-25%). There still remains some difference between the average foreacast of the
statistical versus the dynamical models, with many of the statistical models calling for warm-neutral or only borderline El
Niño conditions developing, and most of the dynamical models
predicting El Niño development and persistence through the remainder of 2012. Redevelopment of La Niña
is predicted to have nearly zero probability, according to the models, despite that at least two statistical models
actually indicate cool-neutral conditions through the Nov-Jan 2012-13 season.
Factors such as known specific model biases and recent changes that the models may have missed
will be taken into account in the next official outlook to be generated and issued in early September by CPC and
IRI, which will include some human judgement in combination with the model guidance.
Using the 0,.45 C thresholds, the climatological probabilities of La Nina, neutral,
and El Nino conditions for each 3-month season are as follows:
Climatological Probabilities
Season | La Niña | Neutral | El Niño |
DJF | 37% | 28% | 35% |
JFM | 34% | 37% | 29% |
FMA | 30% | 48% | 22% |
MAM | 26% | 54% | 20% |
AMJ | 24% | 54% | 22% |
MJJ | 25% | 51% | 24% |
JJA | 25% | 50% | 25% |
JAS | 27% | 46% | 27% |
ASO | 29% | 40% | 31% |
SON | 32% | 34% | 34% |
OND | 34% | 31% | 35% |
NDJ | 37% | 27% | 36% |
See also:
Note 1 - Only models that
produce a new
ENSO prediction every month are included in the above statement.
Top of Page
|