ENSO Quick
Look
IRI
ENSO Update / Forecast
IRI Probabilistic ENSO
Forecast
Technical ENSO Update
ENSO Prediction Plume
Monthly
archive
Technical ENSO Update
20 May 2010
Current Conditions
As of mid-May 2010, SSTs have returned to ENSO-neutral levels throughout
the central and eastern equatorial Pacific. Moderate(+)
El Niño conditions prevailed from late-October
until mid-February, during which the traditional and the equatorial
Southern Oscillation Index (SOI) were mainly negative.
Positive convection anomalies were observed in the vicinity of the
dateline, most prominently between October and March, becoming
particularly strong from late January to early March. Equatorial
Pacific oceanic heat content was above-average during most of 2009,
becoming strongest from late October through early March. A slow
decline in the strength of the El Niño allowed it to endure
through all of April, finally dissipating rapidly during the first
half of May. For April 2009, the SST anomaly in the NINO3.4 region was 0.70 C,
sufficient to be classified as weak El Niño conditions for this
time of year. For the Feb-Mar-Apr season the anomaly was 1.03 degrees C.
Currently the IRI's definition of El Niño conditions rests on an
index of SST anomalies, averaged over the NINO3.4 region (5S-5N; 170W-120W),
exceeding the warmest 25%-ile of the historical distribution, and
similarly for La Niña relative to the 25%-ile coldest conditions
in the historical distribution. The NINO3.4 anomaly necessary to
qualify as La Niña or El Niño conditions for the
May-Jun-Jul and the Jun-Jul-Aug seasons are approximately (-0.50C,
0.45) and (-0.50, 0.45), respectively.
Expected Conditions
The most recent weekly SST anomaly in the NINO3.4 region is -0.1
C, indicating ENSO-neutral conditions in the tropical Pacific; this is
considerably lower than the 0.70 C level observed in April, indicating
that we are in a state of transition. What is the outlook
for the ENSO status going forward? The strongly positive convection anomalies
that were observed near and just east of the dateline early in 2010, that produced
many of the historically observed teleconnected climate effects of El Niño,
have now been replaced by near-zero and some negative convection anomalies
along the immediate equator. May is the month of the year historically
most indicative of transitions in the ENSO state. With the demise of the
moderate(+) El Niño, the question now is whether the current
ENSO-neutral condition will persist over the coming several months,
or rather represents an intermediate point within a transition
toward a La Niña state. A clue to the answer resides in
the fact that negative subsurface sea temperature anomalies,
initially residing in the western tropical Pacific in February and March,
have expanded at depth into the central and eastern Pacific during the
last two months, overlain by an increasingly weak and shallow layer of
residual postive sea temperature anomalies near the surface. Sea temperature
anomalies below the surface often precede sea surface temperature anomalies
to be expected in the following months, particularly as they are subject to
the climatological upwelling in the eastern part of the basin. Current low-level
wind anomalies indicate slightly enhanced trades across most of the tropical
Pacific, and positive traditional and equatorial SOI indices.
These atmospheric features imply average to somewhat above-average
upwelling activity in the eastern tropical Pacific, at least for the
near term, and suggest that the negative subsurface sea temperature
anomalies will likely find their way to the surface during the coming
months, providing the possibility for developing a cool/neutral
ENSO state and possibly La Niña conditions.
Presently, the models and observations taken together indicate
probabilities of about 80% for maintaining ENSO-neutral conditions,
13% for developing La Niña conditions, and 7% for returning
to El Niño conditions during the Apr-May-June season in progress.
Going forward, probabilities for La Niña increase to approximately
40% by Jul-Aug-Sep, while probabilities for neutral and El Niño
conditions become 57% and 3%, respectively. During the seasons of
Aug-Sep-Oct and through early 2011, the probabilities for La Niña,
neutral and El Niño conditions remain at 42%, 55% and 3%,
respectively.
The above assessment was made in part on the basis of an
examination of the current forecasts of ENSO prediction models as well
as the observed conditions. For purposes of this
discussion, El Niño SST conditions are defined
as SSTs in the NINO3.4 region being in the warmest 25% of their
climatological distribution for the 3-month period in question over the
1950-present timeframe. The corresponding cutoff in terms of degrees C
of SST anomaly varies seasonally, being close to 0.40 degrees C in
boreal late-spring to early-summer season and as high as 0.75 degrees C
in late boreal autumn. La Niña conditions are defined as
NINO3.4 region SSTs being in the coolest 25% of the climatological
distribution. Neutral conditions occupy the remaining 50% of the
distribution. These definitions were developed such that the most
commonly accepted El Niño and La Niña episodes are
reproduced.
The models show general agreement regarding the likely lack
of El Niño conditions over the remainder of 2010 and into 2011,
but nonetheless indicate considerable divergence throughout most of
the period. Most of the statistical models predict neutral ENSO
conditions through the period, while the dynamical models tend to
predict either low-neutral or some magnitude of La Niña
condition. Collectively the models average in the low-neutral
range, closer to the Niña threshold than to zero anomaly.
For the current May-Jun-Jul season, 83% of the models are predicting
ENSO-neutral conditions, while 9% apiece predict El Niño
and La Niña conditions, respectively.
At lead times of 4 or more months into the future, statistical and
dynamical models that incorporate information about the ocean's
observed subsurface thermal structure generally exhibit higher
predictive skill than those that do
not. Among models that do use subsurface temperature information, 0
of 11 (0%) indicate El Niño conditions for the Oct-Nov-Dec
season, 8 of 12 (67%) predict ENSO-neutral SSTs, and 4 of 12
(33%) predict La Niña conditions. (Note
1). (Note that La Niño conditions for Oct-Nov-Dec require
a NINO3.4 SST anomaly of -0.75 or stronger.) Caution is
advised in interpreting the distribution of model forecasts as the
actual probabilities. At longer leads, the skill of the models
degrades, and skill uncertainty must be convolved with the
uncertainties from initial conditions and differing model physics,
leading to more climatological probabilities in the long-lead ENSO
Outlook than might be suggested by the suite of models.
Furthermore, the expected skill
of one model versus another has not been established using uniform
validation procedures, which may cause a difference in the true
probability distribution from that taken verbatim from the raw
model predictions.
An alternative way to assess the probabilities of the three
possible ENSO conditions is to use the mean of the forecasts of all
models, and to construct a standard error function centered on that
mean. The standard error would be Gaussian in shape, and would have its
width determined by an estimate of overall expected model skill for the
season of the year and the lead time. Higher skill would result in a
relatively narrower error distribution, while low skill would result in
an error distribution with width approaching that of the historical
observed distribution. This method shows probabilities for La
Niño at about 8% and 23% for May-Jun-Jul and Jun-Jul-Aug,
respectively, increasing to 38% by Jul-Aug-Sep and about 35-40%
from Jul-Aug-Sep onward through early 2011. It should be noted, however,
that several statistical models do not use the subsurface temperature
anomalies as predictors, and are thus missing the explicit information
that the subsurface is now considerably cooler than average. The same
cautions mentioned above for the distribution of model forecasts apply to
this alternative method of inferring probabilities, due to differing model
biases and skills. In particular, this approach considers only the
mean of the predictions, and not the range across the models, nor the
ensemble range within individual
models.
The IRI's
probabilistic ENSO forecast takes into account the indications of
this set of models, the outcome of the standard error approach
described above, and additional factors such as the very latest
observations that may have developed after the initialization times of
some of the models. It indicates a 13% probability for La Niña
conditions in the May-Jun-Jul season in progress, increasing to
near 40% for Jul-Aug-Sep and to 42% from Aug-Sep-Oct forward into early
2011, while ENSO-neutral probabilities begin at 80% for May-Jun-Jul
and decrease to 55% from Aug-Sep-Oct onward. Probability for a return to
El Niño conditions begin at just 7% for May-Jun-Jul and remain at
5% or less from Jun-Jul-Aug onward into early 2011.
See also:
Note 1 - Only models that
produce a new
ENSO forecast every month are included in the above statement.
Top of Page
|