![]() | ||||||
ENSO Quick
Look IRI ENSO Update / Forecast IRI Probabilistic ENSO Forecast Technical ENSO Update ENSO Prediction Plume Monthly archive Technical ENSO Update14 January 2009
Current ConditionsAs of mid-January 2009 SSTs are below-average across the central and eastern Pacific. These SSTs, which now constitute La Niña conditions, developed in early December 2008. They are the result of persistent easterly wind anomalies -- in particular a large fetch of easterly wind anomalies observed from the central to the west-central Pacific since October 2008, corresponding with both the traditional and equatorial Southern Oscillation Indices (SOI) having been consistently positive. Their affect on the sub-surface ocean structure became notable in November, including increasely negative net heat content. Finally, during early December the La Niña conditions of the atmosphere have finally begun encompassing the upper ocean as well. However, given the timing of the seasonal cycle, which has passed its coldest months in the eastern Pacific, it appears that La Niña conditions are likely to be weak and short-lived. Such brief cool conditions occurred during the boreal winters of 2000-2001 and also 2005-2006, but even in those two cases the SST crossed into La Niña conditions earlier than mid-December.For December 2008, the SSTs in the NINO3.4 region were classifiable as La Niña conditions (-0.73 degrees C anomaly), and for the Oct-Nov-Dec season they were -0.40 degrees C from average. Currently the IRI's definition of El Niño conditions rests on an index of SST anomalies, averaged over the NINO3.4 region (5S-5N; 170W-120W), exceeding the warmest 25%-ile of the historical distribution, and similarly for La Niña relative to the 25%-ile coldest conditions in the historical distribution. The magnitude of NINO3.4 anomaly necessary to qualify as La Niña or El Niño conditions for the Jan-Feb-Mar and Feb-Mar-Apr seasons are approximately 0.50C and 0.45, respectively. Expected ConditionsThe most recent weekly SST anomaly in the NINO3.4 region is -1.1 C, indicating La Niña conditions in the tropical Pacific. What are the probabilities for developing a La Niña event (i.e. an "event" refers to La Niña conditions persisting for approximately 5 months) in early 2009? Persistent and large-scale easterly wind anomalies along the equator in the western-to-central Pacific since early October now appear to be coupled to changes in the upper ocean, but after two months of relative oceanic unresponsiveness. The thermocline, which contitutes the main element of the tropical Pacific system imparting ENSO predictability, is shallow in the eastern part of the Pacific, but deep anomalies in the west loom ready to reverse the current cooling.It is possible that the negative anomalies in the east-central Pacific could strengthen to some extent as the recently stronger sub-surface anomaly structure infuences the surface in the coming one to two months. However, as the ITCZ moves closer to the equator, the Trade Winds weaken and the seasonal warming of the eastern Pacific ensues, it will become more difficult for the atmosphere to maintain cold oceanic conditions. The models, both dynamical and statistical, suggest a tendency towards neutral conditions beginning from the first season. Currently, the models indicate probabilities greater than
50% for La Niña conditions, and very little possbility of
developing
El Niño conditions for the coming season. All things considered,
during the Jan-Feb-Mar season there is a 55% probability for La
Niña conditions, 44% probability for ENSO-neutral conditions,
and a near-zero probability for El Niño conditions. The above assessment was made in part on the basis of an examination of the current forecasts of ENSO prediction models as well as the observed conditions. For purposes of this discussion, El Niño SST conditions are defined as SSTs in the NINO3.4 region being in the warmest 25% of their climatological distribution for the 3-month period in question over the 1950-present timeframe. The corresponding cutoff in terms of degrees C of SST anomaly varies seasonally, being close to 0.40 degrees C in northern late-spring/early-summer season and as high as 0.75 degrees C in late northern autumn. La Niña conditions are defined as NINO3.4 region SSTs being in the coolest 25% of the climatological distribution. Neutral conditions occupy the remaining 50% of the distribution. These definitions were developed such that the most commonly accepted El Niño and La Niña episodes are reproduced. The models are showing fair agreement in their ENSO forecasts
through the 10-month forecast period. For the current Jan-Feb-Mar
season, more than half of the models are predicting La Niña
conditions, and the rest predict weakly below-average ENSO-neutral
conditions. By
Mar-Apr-May 2009, and beyond, the models favor ENSO-neutral conditions.
For the FMA 2009 season, 11 of 20 models (55%) predict La
Niña conditions and none predicts El
Niño development. At lead times of more than 4
months into the future, statistical and dynamical models that
incorporate information about the ocean's observed sub-surface thermal
structure generally exhibit higher predictive skill than those that do
not. Among models that do use sub-surface temperature information, only
1 of 14 (7%)
indicates the existence of La Niña, while 2 of 14 (14%) indicate
El Niño
conditions for
the May-Jun-Jul season; 11 of 14 (79%) predict that SSTs will
be ENSO-neutral (Note
1). Caution is
advised in interpreting the distribution of model forecasts as the
actual probabilities. At longer leads, the skill of the models
degrades, and skill uncertainty must be convolved with the
uncertainties from initial conditions and differing model physics,
leading to more climatological probabilities in the long-lead ENSO
Outlook than might be suggested by the suite of models.
Furthermore, the expected skill
of one model versus another has not been established using uniform
validation procedures, which may cause a difference in the true
probability distribution from that taken verbatim from the raw
model predictions. An alternative way to assess the probabilities of the three
possible ENSO conditions is to use the mean of the forecasts of all
models, and to construct a standard error function centered on that
mean. The standard error would be Gaussian in shape, and would have its
width determined by an estimate of overall expected model skill for the
season of the year and the lead time. Higher skill would result in a
relatively narrower error distribution, while low skill would result in
an error distribution with width approaching that of the historical
observed distribution. This method
shows probabilities favoring La
Niña near 60% for JFM and just over 50% for FMA, and then
favoring ENSO-neutral as being consistently most likely by MAM. The
same
cautions mentioned above for the distribution of model forecasts apply
to this alternative method of inferring probabilities, due to differing
model biases and skills. In particular,
this approach considers only the mean of the predictions, and not the
range across the models, nor the ensemble range within individual
models. The IRI's
probabilistic ENSO forecast takes into account the indications of
this set of models, the outcome of the standard error approach
described above, and additional factors such as the very latest
observations that may have developed after the initialization times of
some of the models. It indicates a 55% probability for La Niña
conditions in the coming (JFM) season, and declining after than. See also: Note 1 - Only models that produce a new ENSO forecast every month are included in the above statement.
|