ENSO Quick
Look
IRI
ENSO Update / Forecast
IRI Probabilistic ENSO
Forecast
Technical ENSO Update
ENSO Prediction Plume
Monthly
archive
Technical ENSO Update
16 April 2008
Current Conditions
As of mid-April 2008 SSTs in the central equatorial
Pacific remain below average, but have been trending back towards
average conditions since February 2008. Over
the past months, the cold anomalies have lessened in the
eastern equatorial Pacific.
In addition, warm anomalies began off the coast of South
America in February, and have since spread westward in the equatorial
east Pacific. The
Southern
Oscillation index (SOI) continues to be positive, indicative
of an ongoing La Niña event, but the magnitude has dropped
considerably
over the last couple months. The deep thermocline anomalies in
the western Pacific are adjusting onto the equator and are likely
contributing to the recent reduction in the La Niña
conditions in the far eastern Pacific. Although the low-level winds
continue to diverge from the cold
anomalies, the equatorial heat content is returning to average in the
central-eastern Pacific while increasing in the western Pacific. Taken
together, these anomalous ocean-atmosphere
conditions indicate the potential decline of La Niña conditions.
For March 2008, the SSTs in the NINO3.4 region were below
average
(-1.14 degrees C anomaly), and for the Jan-Feb-Mar season were
-1.60 degrees C from average, indicating that the La Niña event
weakened since February. Currently the IRI's
definition of El Niño conditions rests on an index of SST
anomalies, averaged over the NINO3.4 region (5S-5N; 170W-120W),
exceeding the warmest 25%-ile of the historical distribution, and
similarly for La Niña relative to the 25%-ile coldest conditions
in the historical distribution. The magnitude of NINO3.4 anomaly
necessary to qualify as La Niña or El Niño conditions for
the Apr-May-Jun and May-Jun-Jul seasons are approximately 0.45C.
Expected Conditions
The most recent weekly SST anomaly in the NINO3.4 region, at -0.9 C,
down from -2.1C in February and -1.1C a month ago, suggests the
weakening of the La
Niña conditions.
The issue continues to be how long La Niña conditions are likely
to persist, or equivalently when and
how rapidly the tropical Pacific is likely to transition out of La
Niña conditions. The diverging low-level winds that have been
reinforcing the shallow thermocline
anomalies persist, but are now focussed farther west and are thus
having less
direct impact on the thermocline. The low-level easterly wind anomalies
have been persistent, though, and have built up a mass of warm water in
the western equatorial Pacific that is adjusting onto the
equator. As the deep thermocline anomalies adjust they bring the heat
content back toward neutral conditions, and it is possible that they
may even help
initiate El Niño conditions. Although the indicators of La
Niña have been weakening, most of them still indicate the
existence of La Niña conditions and the models favor persistence
at
least through the Apr-May-Jun season.
Development of El Niño conditions is unlikely,
with probabilities increasing toward 20% by Aug-Sep-Oct 2008. There is
an
approximately 60% likelihood for La Niña conditions to continue
during the Apr-May-Jun season, and a 35% probability
for ENSO-neutral conditions. The probabilities for
La
Niña decline going forward.
The above assessment was made in part on the basis of an
examination of the current forecasts of ENSO prediction models as well
as the observed conditions. For
purposes of this discussion, El Niño SST conditions are defined
as SSTs in the NINO3.4 region being in the warmest 25% of their
climatological distribution for the 3-month period in question over the
1950-present timeframe. The corresponding cutoff in terms of degrees C
of SST anomaly varies seasonally, being close to 0.40 degrees C in
northern late-spring/early-summer season and as high as 0.75 degrees C
in late northern autumn. La Niña conditions are defined as
NINO3.4 region SSTs being in the coolest 25% of the climatological
distribution. Neutral conditions occupy the remaining 50% of the
distribution. These definitions were developed such that the most
commonly accepted El Niño and La Niña episodes are
reproduced.
We are currently entering the [boreal] "Spring Barrier" to
ENSO prediction, and the models diverge in their ENSO forecasts
through
the 10-month forecast period. Over the coming several months, the
majority of the predictions indicate weak-to-moderate La Niña
conditions. The majority of models then remain ENSO-neutral
starting in mid-2008, while a couple models develop El Niño
conditions and a few maintain La Niña conditions. El Niño
conditions are predicted to develop in 2 out of 23 (9%) models.
For
the MJJ 2008
season, 16 of 23 models (70%) predict La
Niña conditions to exist. At lead times of more than 4
months into the future, statistical and dynamical models that
incorporate information about the ocean's observed sub-surface thermal
structure generally exhibit higher predictive skill than those that do
not. Among models that do use sub-surface temperature information, 5
of 15 (33%) indicate La Niña conditions will have continued into
the Aug-Sep-Oct season, and 9 of 15 (60%) predict that SSTs will
be ENSO-neutral (Note
1). Caution is
advised in interpreting the distribution of model forecasts as the
actual probabilities. At longer leads, the skill of the models
degrades, and skill uncertainty must be convolved with the
uncertainties from initial conditions and differing model physics,
leading to more climatological probabilities in the long-lead ENSO
Outlook than might be suggested by the suite of models.
Furthermore, the expected skill
of one model versus another has not been established using uniform
validation procedures, which may cause a difference in the true
probability distribution from that taken verbatim from the raw
model predictions.
An alternative way to assess the probabilities of the three
possible ENSO conditions is to use the mean of the forecasts of all
models, and to construct a standard error function centered on that
mean. The standard error would be Gaussian in shape, and would have its
width determined by an estimate of overall expected model skill for the
season of the year and the lead time. Higher skill would result in a
relatively narrower error distribution, while low skill would result in
an error distribution with width approaching that of the historical
observed distribution. When this method is applied to the current model
forecasts, results indicate similar probabilities for La
Niña. For those
probabilities, La Niña is 54% likely for the May-Jun-Jul
season.
The probabilities for La Niña
then decline with time through 2008. This method
shows probabilities for ENSO-neutral beginning low, and
reaching the climatological likelihood of 50% by mid-2008, while El
Niño
likelihood doesn't even reach its climatological probability of 25%.
The same
cautions
mentioned above for the
distribution of model forecasts apply to this alternative method of
inferring
probabilities, due to differing model biases and skills. In particular,
this approach considers only the mean of the predictions, and not the
range across the models, nor the ensemble range within individual models.
The IRI's
probabilistic ENSO forecast takes into account the indications of
this set of models, the outcome of the standard error approach
described above, and additional factors such as the very latest
observations that may have developed after the initialization times of
some of the models. It indicates a 60% probability for La
Niña
conditions to persist in the coming season.
See also:
Note 1 - Only models that
produce a new
ENSO forecast every month are included in the above statement.
Top of Page
|